This will be the title of the blog post: "Court Injunctions are the Thoughts and Prayers of Data Breach Response". It's got a nice ring to it, and it resonates so much with the response to other disasters where the term is offered as a platitude that has absolutely no practical benefit at all. You know, like the Qantas injunction to prevent data from their breach being examined by other parties. So, whilst it means journos won't be poring over it (and we won't be loading it into HIBP), criminals will pay no attention to it whatsoever. More to come in the forthcoming blog post.
References
- Sponsored by: Report URI: Guarding you from rogue JavaScript! Don’t get pwned; get real-time alerts & prevent breaches #SecureYourSite
- Qantas was granted an injunction in the wake of their data breach... (which has absolutely no effect whatsoever on criminals who want to do crime with the data)
- Using Teespring for our merch store has been an absolutely woeful experience (but using Fourthwall has been great!)
- I'm in the Microsoft MVP and RD fold for another one and two years (still a Regional Director with no region and no directing, but it's a cool program all the same 🙂)
- The Creams Cafe breach went into HIBP (lot of different channels tried to get in touch with them in advance, but alas...)